MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7098391585

Great Lakes Forestry Centre Insect Production Services STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

2013· article· en· W7098391585 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarantineOfficerGovernment (linguistics)Factory (object-oriented programming)Plan (archaeology)Production (economics)Phone
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) has been modified for applicability to the newly constructed Great Lakes Forestry Centre (GLFC) Insect Quarantine (IQ) Facility. Changes include the following:-The floor plan has been revised.-The title “Insect Quarantine Officer (IQO) ” has been revised to “Bio-Safety Officer (BSO) ” to match terminology used by the regulatory authority (i.e., Canadian Food Inspection Agency- CFIA).-Insect Production Services (IPS) personnel now have a separate entrance to the quarantine facility via the domestic rearing zone; all other personnel are restricted from using this entrance.-When portions of the quarantine zone require heightened bio-safety measures, personnel working in those areas will be required to wear bunny suits, shoe covers, head covers and beard covers (if applicable), rather than lab coats as required elsewhere in the facility; notices will be posted in the change rooms and at affected research modules whenever heightened bio-safety measures are required.-Personnel no longer have access to the entire quarantine facility, only to areas for which access was approved by the BSO.-Lists of equipment available to facility users have been revised.-Storage room C343 is no longer available to facility users.-Facility users will be required to assist with splitting of log bolts when quantities are large or when the log bolts exceed the maximum size restriction.-A central vacuum system, chemical fume hood and wireless phone system are

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.193
Threshold uncertainty score0.401

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSesquiterpenes and Asteraceae StudiesFrench-language works237,207