Production of the New, London and New York: Continuum.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
écritures, Québec: Presses de l’Université de Laval. Books of essays devoted to the individual and/or joint work of Deleuze and Guattari usually explore their ideas in relation to a wide variety of areas. Deleuze, Guattari and the Production of the New and Contr’hommage pour Gilles Deleuze are no exception to this rule: there are contributions across the two volumes dealing with pure philosophy, intellectual history, the arts (painting, conceptual art, music, cinema and literature, though nothing on architecture), method in the social sciences, and cultural/political critique – especially modes of resistence to capitalism, above all in its post-industrial, ‘cognitive ’ form. These areas often overlap within particular essays. As its title implies, the Laval volume only discusses solo Deleuze and the joint work, not solo Guattari, but its unity is primarily linguistic (it is in French) and geographic (it is very much a product of Québec). These two elements are not on the whole alluded to overtly in the book, but they do give it a distinctive underlying tone, since the concepts of ‘peuple manquant’ and ‘littérature mineure ’ could be applied with some justification to the people and the culture of Québec, and the French language connection means that certain more ‘authentic ’ aspects of Deleuze come through, above all his attitude to Marxism. Anglo-Saxon commentators do not always understand that the wrestling with Marx of such French philosophers as Merleau-Ponty, Derrida and Lyotard, as well as Deleuze, has the complexity of a lapsed Catholic’s anti-clericalism. Even if this could be regarded as a limitation to be overcome, it still needs to be
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.141 | 0.050 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".