Bibliographic record
Abstract
Treaties between the United States and Canada created the Intern~tional Fisheries Commission to investigate the halibut fishery of the northern Pacific Ocean, including Bering Sea, and to take steps to preserve and restore this fishery. The present is the ninth report upon the scientific investigations of the Commission. Formerly there was a huge supply of halibut on the banks, and an abundance of spawners. Overfishing cut this down to a very serious point. This decline in the amount of fish on the banks has been fully dealt with irt previous reports of the Commission. There was not only a decline in the catch per unit of gear, but also in the total catch taken from the banks. The catch per unit of standard size fell from 272 pounds in 1906 to abOut 36 pounds in 1930 on the grounds off British Columbia. Off Southeastern Alaska the catch fell from 180 pounds per unit in 1914 to 54 pounds in 1928. In the Gulf of Alaska the fall was from 320 pounds per unit in 1915 to 65 pounds in 1930. The total quantity taken from the grounds south of Cape Spencer fell from 60 million pounds in 1912 to 22.% million pounds in 1930.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.396 | 0.219 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".