MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7098451079

CGU HS Committee on River Ice Processes and the Environment 14th Workshop on the Hydraulics of Ice Covered Rivers

2007· article· en· W7098451079 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydraulicsFlumeStratification (seeds)Hydrology (agriculture)Flow (mathematics)SupercoolingTurbulence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On rivers and lakes with low flow velocities, which are usually associated with low turbulence characteristics, the surface temperature will not be mixed through the whole depth of the water; this creates a vertical temperature gradient (i.e., warm at depth, cool at the surface). When there is stratification and the surface temperature reaches supercooling surface ice begins to form at the water surface. The physical processes leading to the formation of surface ice are not fully understood, yet its presence on water surface affects the operation of many different kinds of hydraulic structures. Herein, a counter rotating flume located in the Hydraulics Research & Testing Facility at The University of Manitoba was used to extensively study the formation of skim ice for variable flow parameters: water depth, flow velocity, bed roughness, and air temperature. Two thermometers, one on the surface layer and the other on the average depth, are used to study the temperature gradient and the degree of supercooling on the water surface and on the depth. Two cameras, one located on the top and the other on the side, are used to capture the ice particles on the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.169

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0500.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies→French-language works237,207→