Species: Meadow Willow (Salix petiolaris) Global Rank: G5 State Rank: S4 Climate Change Vulnerability Index: Not Vulnerable\\Presumed Stable Confidence: Very High
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The range of meadow willow extends from Colorado and New Jersey to northern Canada (NatureServe 2010). The species occurs in wet meadows, fens, along stream banks and lakeshores, and in forest clearings (Rhoads and Block 2007). The species requires direct sunlight and will grow in a variety of moist soil conditions. It is associated with disturbed and early successional habitat. Current Threats: Meadow willow is threatened by deer herbivory and displacement by exotic plant species. Main Factors Contributing to Vulnerability Rank: Although meadow willow is at its southern range limit in Pennsylvania and requires a localized hydrological regime that may experience some drying due to climate change, its CCVI rank suggests that the species is Not Vulnerable/Presumed Stable. Available evidence does not suggest that the abundance and/or range extent within Pennsylvania will change (increase/decrease) substantially by 2050. However, actual range boundaries may change. Longer distance dispersal and the ability to grow in moist conditions in a
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.041 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".