Key to the Canadian Identity and the Knowledge Economy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
the Internet: In implementing the provisions of the Official Languages Act, the Government of Canada cannot escape the necessity of promoting the French language on the Internet. For this, it needs to have in place an integrated strategy, a targeted action plan, and the necessary investment, all based on a global perspective of the issues. In August 1999, the Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages released The Government of Canada and French on the Internet.1 This special study offered twelve recommendations to the Government of Canada aimed at establishing the policy framework, strategy and investments needed to increase the use of French on the Internet. This follow-up study, entitled French on the Internet: Key to the Canadian Identity and the Knowledge Economy, begins by assessing what progress the Government of Canada has made in implementing these recommendations. It concludes that while some progress has been made, there remains much to do. To be blunt, the performance of the Government of Canada in promoting French on the Internet leaves much to be desired, since fewer than half of the recommendations from the 1999 special study have been followed up in any significant
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".