Instrument for Detecting Freeze-up, Mid-Winter and Break-up Ice Processes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new underwater acoustic instrument for river ice studies has been designed, developed, and deployed in the Peace River in Northern Alberta, which is hydraulically regulated by upstream hydroelectric projects. The data is being collected to support studies related to ice jam occurrences and hydropower operations during the winter. An upward looking sonar instrument was deployed for the 2004-2005 ice season. From the acoustic backscatter returns of the transmitted acoustic pulses, the sonar instrument measured the distance to the water surface or the underside of floating ice at the surface. The instrument also had the capability to record the profile of acoustic backscatter returns through the river water column. The instrument provided valuable insights into numerous freeze-up, mid-winter and spring ice processes difficult or impossible to obtain by other methods. These processes included formation of frazil in suspension, development of frazil ice pans, anchor ice formation/detection, formation of the river ice cover including highly dynamic freeze-up events, changes in the river ice cover over
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it