Bibliographic record
Abstract
: The f 0 (1500) is observed in its KK decay 1 Now at College of William & Mary, Williamsburg,USA 2 Now at Universitat Dresden, Dresden, Germany 3 This work is the Ph.D. thesis of S. v. Dombrowski 4 University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia 5 University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland 6 Now at DESY, Hamburg, Germany 7 Now at CRPP, Ottawa, Canada 8 Now at Max Planck Institute, Munchen, Germany mode in an amplitude analysis of high statistics data in pp annihilation at rest into ß 0 KLKL . The mass and width is found to be (m; \\Gamma) = (1515 \\Sigma 20; 105 \\Sigma 15) MeV. A comparison of the decay rate into 2ß 0 shows that this state cannot be dominantly ss. The f 0 2 (1525) has been observed for the first time in pp annihilation and its production rate is consistent with the expectation from the OZI rule. We have reported the observation of a new 0370-2693/96/$03.50 c fl Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North-Holland Physics Publishing Division) Volume 1, numb...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.134 | 0.095 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".