MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7098590398

Subcontracting by stealth in London’s hotels: impacts and implications for labour organising. Just Labor: A Canadian journal of work and society

2007· article· en· W7098590398 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChemical synthesis and alkaloids
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRestructuringDemiseTrade unionGlobalizationWorkforceLegislationEarningsAgency (philosophy)Work (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

he British economy has undergone marked changed in the last three decades or so. Restructuring driven by a neoliberal political economic agenda has led to the demise of manufacturing as the key sector of the economy and its replacement with producer and consumer services. This shift has been accompanied by a reconfiguration of labour markets, entailing a polarisation of the workforce in terms of both skills and earnings (Sassen 1996; Goos and Manning 2003). The growing globalisation of markets has in turn intensified the pressure on firms to improve their competitiveness, prompting a relentless search for ways of cutting down on labour costs. T In Britain, Conservative governments from the late 1970s to the mid-1990s sought to improve the competitiveness of the economy through labour market deregulation, enacting legislation to reduce employment protection and remove workers ’ rights, at the same time as taking measures to weaken trade union organisation. This paved the way for the growth of non-standard forms of work. The rise in part-time, temporary and agency work, along with labour subcontracting, explains how employers have been able to hire workers to do similar work on differentiated pay rates, working hours and

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.667
Threshold uncertainty score0.671

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicChemical synthesis and alkaloidsFrench-language works237,207