Bibliographic record
Abstract
The domestic economy grew by 6.9 percent in the first quarter of 2007, its fastest rate in the last 17 years. It was a big leap from last year’s first quarter gross domestic product (GDP) growth rate of 5.7 percent, and surpassed the government’s earlier forecast of 5.3 percent to 6.1 percent. The surge in the growth of transport, retail trade and mining as well as the government’s pump priming activities propped up the GDP growth. OFW remittances continued its inflow, posting a hefty growth of 14.0 percent during the quarter compared to last year’s 3.4 percent. However, the net factor income from abroad was pulled down by the decline in the property income by 7.1 percent and the increase in the property expense by 25.7 percent. As a result, gross national product (GNP) growth was 0.3 percentage point lower than the GDP 6.6 percent. Production Side Services sector still drives growth. The services sector remained as the linchpin of the economy in the first quarter of 2007, expanding by a robust 9.1 percent. The major contributors in the sector’s growth were transportation, communication and storage, finance; and private services. Transport and storage went up by 8.8 percent, from-0.3 percent last year. There was a strong demand for motor vehicles, whose sales grew by 15 percent in the first quarter of the year. Election activities, likewise, increased the demand for all means of transportation. Finance continued to post a double-digit growth, albeit slightly lower at 13.4 percent. Banks ’ growth decelerated to 8.1 percent after posting a 19.8 percent growth in the first quarter of last year. This was due to the decline in the interest incomes of banks. Non-banks and insurance, in contrast, posted a vigorous growth of 17.2 percent and 33.9 percent, respectively, a big turnaround from the measly 0.6 percent and 2.0 percent growth rates in the same period in 2006. Non-banks benefited from the trading gains
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.625 | 0.448 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".