MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7098599325

MORPHOSEDIMENTOLOGY OF SUBMARINE MASS-MOVEMENTS AND GRAVITY FLOWS OFFSHORE SEPT-ÎLES, NW GULF OF ST. LAWRENCE (QUÉBEC, CANADA)

2016· article· en· W7098599325 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurbiditeSubmarine pipelineCoringSubmarineMass wastingDebris flowContinental shelfFluvial
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent multibeam sonar and acoustic subbottom profiler surveys and sediment coring offshore the city of Sept-Îles (NW Gulf of St. Lawrence) reveal different types of submarine mass-movements and gravity flows in glaciomarine, paraglacial and postglacial deposits. These mass-movement and gravity flow features are slumps, gullies and channel-levee systems and fans. The key results of this study include: 1) slumps involve the entire deglacial and postglacial sequence, indicating their recent triggering; 2) identification of a 57-cm thick turbidite and several sand layers in sediment cores collected in a deep and isolated basin unaffected by fluvial inputs, along with 210Pb measurements, indicate the recent activity of mass wasting events derived from slope instabilities; 3) important volumes of sediments are being transported from the coastal to the deeper marine environment by gravity flows processes on the prodelta of the Moisie River. Hypotheses for explaining the widespread occurrence of recent mass-movements due to slope instabilities in the area possibly include their possible triggering by the AD 1663 (M~7) or another large earthquake.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMediterranean and Iberian flora and faunaFrench-language works237,207