A FAIR MODAL SHARE FOR CYCLING: TWENTY PERCENT BY 2020 IN ORLANDO By
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This proposal advocates committing Orlando to becoming the first metropolitan area in the United States that develops a bicycle trail and off-road path system which results in 20 % of all trips by bicycle, or as transportation professionals say, in cycling assuming 20 % of the modal share, the proportion of travel by a particular mode such as cycling, public transport, driving, or walking. Over the last decade, the cycling rate in Orlando has remained at an officially guesstimated one-half of one percent of all trips; it seems likely the present `rate is actually less than a quarter of a per cent. During the same period, the volume of vehicular traffic increased exponentially, bringing our automobile use far beyond what is economically, socially, and environmentally optimal. Increasing the modal share for cycling will move us toward a balanced multimodal transportation system, providing many economic, social, and environmental benefits that our 96 % monomodal system does not. It will support President Bush's national initiative to reverse dependence on foreign oil (White House, 2003, January 28) as well as a long-term strategic plan for our diverse and
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".