MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7098670526

PROTOCOL Outcomes in the offspring n K

2016· article· en· W7098670526 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGestational diabetesOffspringPregnancyDiabetes mellitusGlucose tolerance testProtocol (science)GestationImpaired glucose tolerancePopulation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

estimated that about 470 million people will be diag-nosed with pre-diabetes globally by the year 2030 [1]. During pregnancy, women can develop a dysglycemic state known as gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Swaleh et al. Systematic Reviews (2015) 4:67 DOI 10.1186/s13643-015-0051-1been found to influence fetal development and has bothHamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5, Canada Full list of author information is available at the end of the articlePre-diabetes includes impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, and hemoglobin A1c of 6 % to 6.4% [2]. Currently, the crude prevalence of pre-diabetes in the United States is roughly 30 % among individuals greater than 20 years old [3]. The Canadian Diabetes Association (CDA) estimates that 5.7 million out of the Although most women with GDM have normal blood sugars after delivery, the risk of developing subsequent T2DM is higher [7]. The diagnostic criteria for GDM vary internationally but generally involve a two-step process: an initial screening challenge with glucose followed by a standardized 75 (or 100) g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) if the screen is abnormal. More details on the classification of GDM are included in the methods. This dysglycemic state during pregnancy has * Correspondence:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.068
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score0.726

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.068
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2170.049

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlant Taxonomy and PhylogeneticsFrench-language works237,207