Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tina Carlisi and Katerina Lagassé have recently worked together as the programming collective for FOFA gallery’s Recto/Verso: Manifestation/Demonstration. Manifestation/Demonstration considered the swelling activism in Québec, providing a spatial intensive for invited artist collectives, which created platforms for dialogue, sites for gathering, place-making, production and exchange. Tina Carlisi is an artist-designer whose work and research focuses on print as a social engaged practice. She is currently completing her Masters in the Faculty of Fine Arts at Concordia University. Her arts-based thesis considers how art and design are being used as part of the current student movement in Québec. Katerina Lagassé originates from Halfmoon Bay, British Columbia. She recently finished a BA in Communication Studies and Art History at Concordia University. Her interests lay in the forms of knowledge and narratives made tangible through art experiences. She participates in different spaces of exhibition and research creation. Chosen keyword Carré Carré is a participatory installation where four swings are suspended above a large platform (108 ” x 108 ” x 6’). Each swing is suspended at a different height and at a different proximity to the other. As participants engage with the piece, its design is meant to facilitate a conscious recognition and possible negotiation of individual and collective space. The title, Carré, references the carré rouge, the visual symbol of the Québec student movement, while investigating the changing relations in city squares and public spaces in light of social uprisings. Throughout the spring and summer of 2012, the student manifestations in Montréal transformed the spatial politics of the city, where thousands of bodies participated and reconfigured the city centre. Carré proposes a site for reflection on the experience of public space on how these experiences shift our understanding of them.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.302 | 0.092 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".