FRONTIERS OF E-BUSINESS RESEARCH 2005 Postmodern Knowledge Creation Approach in Software Product Development Companies Abstract
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study applies the postmodern knowledge creation approach to the creation and development of knowledge in software product development companies and empirically tests the applicability of postmodern knowledge creation approach to software product design and development processes. The main characteristics of postmodern approach to knowledge creation are self-reflexivity in knowledge production, incredulity towards meta-narrative, capability of adaptation, and capability of being critical and suspicious of our own intellectual assumptions. It is hypnotized in this study that since the degrees of uncertainty and degree of change during software product design and development processes are relatively high, the characteristics of postmodern knowledge creation approach are applicable to the creation and development of knowledge in software product development companies. For testing the hypothesis, an empirical research is conducted on 52 small and medium-sized software product development companies in Canada. The findings of the empirical research support the main argument of this study and show that postmodern approach to knowledge is applicable to the creation and development of knowledge in most of surveyed software product development companies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it