Bibliographic record
Abstract
Survey of Canada (GSC) are co-operating in a program of geological mapping for the Winnipeg region, with emphasis on engineering and environmental geology. The surficial component of the NATMAP proj-ect was completed in two phases for the area from 49 ° to 51°N and from 95 ° to 98°W. In addition to completion of associated topical investiga-tions, current emphasis is on compilation of the NATMAP outputs, and other co-operative GSC work in the area, into a synthesis. When com-bined with other MGS programs, such as the Capital Region Study, this synthesis will lead to generation of a three-dimensional (3-D) digital geological model for all deposits above the Precambrian, first in the NATMAP area and then for all Phanerozoic terrane in southern Manitoba. The inputs to this model include a digital elevation model, large lake bathymetry, offshore seismic surveys, surficial geology maps, lithological data for the Quaternary from water-well and other drillhole and geophysical databases, bedrock surface elevations, bedrock maps, Phanerozoic stratigraphic data and previous Phanerozoic models, and sub-Phanerozoic Precambrian geological maps. Completion of all proj-ect outputs is planned for March 2002.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.220 | 0.074 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".