MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7098741561

The Canadian Mineralogist

2015· article· en· W7098741561 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEttringiteHexagonal crystal systemManganeseResidue (chemistry)Thermal
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thermal analyses (DTA and TG) were carried out on sturmanite and ettringite from the Kalahari Manganese Field, South Africa. The TG trace for sturmanite, approximately Ca6(Fe3+1.5Al0.3Mn2+0.2)2.0{[B(OH)4]1.2(SO4)2.3}3.5(OH)12•25H2O, indicates that H2O(g) is lost at about 135°C, SO3(g) is lost at about 1349°C, and the residue melts at about 1154°C. In sturmanite, a polymorphic transition occurs at about 627°C. For ettringite, approximately Ca6Al2(SO4)3(OH)12•26H2O, the H2O(g) and SO3(g) are lost at about 149 and 753°C, respectively, and the residue melts at about 1176°C. Ettringite melts after the liberation of both H2O(g) and SO3(g), whereas sturmanite melts after the liberation of H2O(g). The loss of SO3(g) occurs at a considerably lower temperature in ettringite than in sturmanite. Using powder X-ray diffraction, the unit-cell parameters for sturmanite are a 11.157(1), c 21.846(3) Å, V 2355.2(8) Å3 for the hexagonal supercell, and a 11.147(3), c 10.918(5) Å, V 1174.9(9) Å3 for the subcell. The unit-cell parameters for ettringite are a 11.223(1), c 21.474(2) Å, V 2342.2(5) Å3 for the hexagonal supercell, and a 11.229(1), c 10.732(2) Å, V 1171.9(3) Å3 for the subcell. The volume of sturmanite is only slightly larger than that of ettringite.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.550
Threshold uncertainty score0.932

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3470.158

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→