MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7098750473

University of Manitoba Retirees Association Minutes of the Annual General Meeting

2007· article· en· W7098750473 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA and Biological Computing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHonourLogo (programming language)SilenceChapelAssociation (psychology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

a. The Ad Hoc Committee on a Retiree’s Centre has been reactivated. b. UMRA has an office in the Alumni House with a telephone and computer. c. The winner of the logo competition is Maureen Johnston. She was presented with a life membership as the prize. 4. Reports a. President- Copies of the President’s report were distributed. Coffee mugs with the new UMRA logo have been ordered. The Executive Committee has had a preliminary discussion about creating an UMRA scholarship. b. Communications Committee- John Mundie distributed the Committee’s report c. Benefits and Pensions Committee- Frits Stevens distributed the Committee’s report. In response to a member’s concern that the $1,000 per annum limit on dental claims was too low, Frits said that he would bring this matter to the attention of the committee. d. Membership Committee- Diane Biehl distributed the Committee’s report. Lois Brockman asked that a minute of silence be observed in honour of the memory of members who died in the past year. e. Treasurer- Jim Jamieson distributed copies of the Treasurer’s report on behalf of Doug MacEwan. i. Motion (D. MacEwan, J. Jamieson)- That Murray Hilton continue to act as auditor for 2007-08. Carried

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.531
Threshold uncertainty score0.758

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4690.255

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDNA and Biological ComputingFrench-language works237,207