240 Canadian Journal of Counselling / Revue Canadienne de Counseling /1992, Vol. 26:4 Empowering Rural Parents to Support Youth Career Development: An Interim Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Work being done on a three-year project aimed at developing innovative ways to help rural parents support the career development of 15-25-year-old youth is described. The project makes use of an innovative data-gathering strategy and innovative techniques for analyzing qualitative group interview data. The paper describes identified rural career-related needs and discusses proposed products designed to address these needs. Resume Cet article decrit un projet visant Ie developpement de moyens innovateurs pour inviter les parents, du milieu rural, it supporter Ie developpement it la carriere des jeunes de 1.5 it 25 aIlS. Ce projet s'etend sur une periode de trois annees. Le projet utilise des strategies et des techniques innovatrices pour la cueillette de donnees et pour analyser les donnees qualitatives de groupes d'interviews. L'identification des besoins specifiques relies it la carriere dans Ie milieu rural est decrite et les alternatives proposees destinees it adresser ces besoins sont discutees. The rural situation presents unique challenges to the career decision-
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.074 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".