Heliospora n.g. and Rotundi^ta n.g., Gregarines of Gammarus pulex BY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
THE gregarines of Gammarus pulex L. have long been known, in factthey were some of the earliest of these Sporozoa to be observed (Text-figs. 1-3). However,.so far, no adequate description has been given of the gametes and spores which are the most important stages from the systematic point of view. Lady Muriel Percy, who worked in this Department from 1925 to 1929, helped in the investigation of spores by collecting infected Gammarus from different localities and isolating the Gregarine cysts for observations. From her notes and figures together with mine, which extend at intervals over the last quarter of a century, I have endeavoured to elucidate the life-histories of these two gregarines for which, I regret to say, it has been necessary to estab-lish new genera as above. Apparently Siebold was the first to study the trophozoites—some time in the early eighteen-forties. He did not describe them in his paper of 1839, ^ has been erroneously stated by several writers, but gave Kolliker permission to incorporate his description in a postscript to his (Kolliker's) paper of 1848.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".