MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7098800724

UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Development of Map Aided GPS Algorithms for Vehicle Navigation in Urban Canyons

2005· article· en· W7098800724 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Diversity and Evolution
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobal Positioning SystemTime to first fixAssisted GPSNoise (video)GPS signalsDigital mappingSatelliteMap matchingDigital elevation model
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A major portion of the Location-Based Services (LBS) market deals with applications involving in-car navigation systems. The Global Positioning System (GPS) is the most popular choice for positioning in such applications. Many LBS applications involve positioning in urban areas having high rise buildings. Although GPS has good positioning accuracy in open sky conditions, it suffers from line-of-sight issues in urban canyons. This thesis formulates some new methods for aiding GPS using maps for vehicle navigation in urban canyons. GPS satellite availability in urban canyons can be improved by using a High Sensitivity GPS (HS GPS) receiver which can track weak signals. However, this introduces large errors and noise in measurements. Thus, reliability monitoring becomes necessary with such receivers in signal degraded environments. Maps and Digital Elevation Models (DEM) provide effective constraints to compute an outlier-free solution. In this research, a robust fuzzy logic-based approach is developed for road segment identification. This identified road segment is then used in a GPS computation model and is referred to as Map Aided GPS (MAGPS). The performances of

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.803
Threshold uncertainty score0.417

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlant Diversity and EvolutionFrench-language works237,207