Canadian Credit Aggregates Description Usage Format Details
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Canadian credit aggregates. data(CanadianCreditData) data(CanadianCreditData.asof.6Mar2009) data(CanadianCreditData.asof.5Jun2007) data(CanadianCreditData.asof.3Mar2006) data(CanadianCreditData.asof.28Jan2005) The objects are time series. Several data objects are loaded, as listed in the table ”Canadian Credit Variable Definitions”. The CanadianCreditData usage loads the most recent version and other usages loads data as of the given date. These data are the Canadian Credit aggregates in millions of Canadian dollars. Canadian Credit Variable Definitions variable (ID) short description longer description TotalCredit total credit total household and business credit ConsumerCredit consumer credit total consumer credit ResidentialMortgage residential mortgage total residential mortgage credit ShortTermBusinessCredit short term-business credit total short-term business credit OtherBusinessCredit other business credit total other business credit The components in this database are not seasonally adjusted (SA), but the corresponding Bank of Canada / Statistics Canada Cansim II numbers for the seasonally adjusted aggregates are as as
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.011 | 0.041 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.438 | 0.275 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".