MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7098834269

THE UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Estimation of the Shape Parameter in the Elliptical Family of Distributions Based on Non–Parametric Measures of Association

2007· article· en· W7098834269 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBivariate analysisRobustness (evolution)Quadrant (abdomen)Measure (data warehouse)CorrelationPopulationVariance (accounting)Elliptical distributionEstimation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ii It is not so well known that there exist relationships between the correlation ρ (associ-ation parameter) of a bivariate normal population and some non–parametric measures of association such as Kendall’s tau and Spearman’s rho. These relationships are intro-duced for the two aforementioned measures along with Blomqvist’s quadrant measure of association. These relationships are not necessarily limited to the normal distribution and it is illustrated that for the family of elliptical distributions the relationship between Kendall’s tau or Blomqvist’s quadrant measure and the parameter ρ holds. Based on these relationships robust estimates of the association (correlation) param-eter are proposed. The properties of these estimates are investigated via simulation for various elliptical distributions in terms of bias, variance and root mean square error, and the robustness to extreme observations of these non–parametric estimates for the association parameter are discussed when a normal sample is contaminated with a few outliers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score0.605

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStatistical Distribution Estimation and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207