GEOLOGY OF DOLOMITE-HOSTED MAGNESITE DEPOSITS 0:T THE BRISCO AND DRIFTWOOD CREEK AREAS, BRITISH COLUMBIA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The magnesite deposits of the Brisco and Driftwood Creek areas are located approximately 30 and SO kilometres, respectively, northwest of Radium Hot Springs (Figure 4-9-1). Most of the deposits are accessible by forestry roads. The first magnesite discovery in the area dates back to the early Sixties. Some of the deposits have been investigated by drilling, trenching and bulk sampling. Up to the present, no commercial production has resulted from these activities. REGIONAL GEOLOGK SETTIFIG The Brisco and Driftwoocl Creek deposi:s are situted west of the Rocky Mountain Trench fault Figure 4-51-2). They are hosted by dolomites o~ ’ the Helikian Mount Ndsm Formation of the Purcell Supergroup witt in the Purcell anticlinorium. Stratigraphic s a tions applica,le to the;m:a of the magnesite deposits ‘wre esta.blish:d by Wdkm (1926), Reesor (1973) and Bmnett (1985). “he geology of the Toby and Horsethief Creek:ireas has been descrikd tsy
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".