Information Needs Towards Service Life
Bibliographic record
Abstract
this paper is published in / Une version de ce document se trouve dans : 17 th International CODATA Conference, "Data and Information for the Coming Knowledge Millennium" www.nrc.ca/irc/ircpubs NRCC-44508 Information Needs towards Service Life Asset Management Brian R. Kyle, Dana J. Vanier, Branka Kosovac, and Thomas M. Froese Public Works and Government Services Canada, Architecture & Engineering, Technology, Facility Life-cycle Management, Place du Portage III, 8B1, Hull, Qubec, Canada K1A 0S5 Co-authors' e-mail addresses: brian.kyle@pwgsc.gc.ca, dana.vanier@nrc.ca, branka@civil.ubc.ca, tfroese@civil.ubc.ca The paper stresses the importance of formalized information storage, updating and integration in the domain of "Service Life Asset Management". The scope of this domain includes all data, knowledge and information required to manage a "built" asset from construction to deconstruction. "Service Life Asset Management" comprises a significant portion of the funds expended by the construction industry each year
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".