MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7098867886

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2006· article· en· W7098867886 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPhytochemistry and Biological Activities
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadioactive wastePlan (archaeology)Characterization (materials science)Consistency (knowledge bases)LicenseNuclear decommissioningSite selectionTrack (disk drive)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

(DGR) for low and intermediate level radioactive waste at the Bruce Nuclear site, located near Tiverton, Ontario. The DGR will be constructed as an engineered facility comprising a series of underground emplacement rooms at a depth of about 660 m below ground surface within the Paleozoic argillaceous limestone of the Lindsay Formation. This report describes the Geoscientific Site Characterization Plan (GSCP) recommended to acquire the necessary geoscientific information to support the development of descriptive geosphere models of the Bruce Nuclear site and the preparation of a DGR environmental assessment and site preparation/construction license application to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission. The GSCP described in this document addresses the site characterization data and information needs of DGR safety assessment and repository engineering functions. The important DGR geoscience data needs include: geological setting and framework, geomechanical setting and framework, hydraulic properties and state, diffusion and sorption properties, groundwater/porewater characterization and seismicity. The GSCP provides a technical description of the selection and proposed application of preferred tools and methods for site-specific geoscientific characterization of the sedimentary

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.435
Threshold uncertainty score0.622

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhytochemistry and Biological ActivitiesFrench-language works237,207