MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7098908825

The coexistence of melts of hydrous copper chloride, sulfide and silicate compositions in a magnesiohastingsite cumulate, TUBAF seamount, Papua New Guinea. Canadian Mineralogist 42

2004· article· en· W7098908825 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSilicateMagmaHydrothermal circulationMelt inclusionsChalcopyritePetrographySulfideXenolith
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Direct evidence for a Cu–Cl-salt-hydrate melt in equilibrium with a complex system of silicate melts was found in a xenolith of magnesiohastingsite-dominant cumulate from the TUBAF Seamount, near Lihir Island, in Papua New Guinea. The cumulate formed less than 1.5 Ma ago in a magma chamber in the oceanic crust. Petrographic observations give evidence for the coexist-ence of two different silicate melts, a Cu–Fe–S melt, the salt-hydrate melt and a vapor phase as an intercumulus assemblage. The salt-hydrate melt crystallized to clinoatacamite, whereas the only mineral crystallizing from the silicate melt was hydroxylapatite. The two observed silicate melts are of trachyandesitic-tephriphonolitic and foiditic composition, clearly different from the trachybasaltic host-magma. Exsolution of the Cu–Fe–S melt likely took place in the temperature range between 960 ° and 557°C. Its chemical composition ranges between chalcopyrite and intermediate solid-solution (Iss). On the basis of experimental data of other salt-hydrate – silicate melt systems, the unmixing of the Cu–Cl-salt-hydrate melt must have taken place below 800°C. This unmixing demonstrates how metal-enriched magmatic fluids can enter pre-existing hydrothermal systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.154

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→