MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7098921377

The Role of Credit Ratings in Managing Credit Risk in Federal Treasury Activities

2008· article· en· W7098921377 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFood Science and Nutritional Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCredit referenceCredit historyCredit ratingBond credit ratingCredit enhancementTreasuryVariety (cybernetics)Credit risk
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

he ongoing turbulence in financial markets has been accompanied by growing concern that the use of credit ratings may have encouraged some investors to rely too heavily on ratings as a summary statistic of risk. The Bank of Canada has raised the issue of overreliance on credit ratings through public speeches and in an article in the previous issue of the Financial System Review (Zelmer 2007). Like many other central banks and market participants, the Bank of Canada (the Bank) uses a variety of tools, including credit ratings, in the management of credit risk in its own activities and in those that it carries out for the federal government (the government) as its fiscal agent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.034
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.105
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.191

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0340.105
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0100.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFood Science and Nutritional StudiesFrench-language works237,207