Comprehensive Sites o Foreign Affairs Online (University of Virginia)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Comprehensive annotated guide to foreign relations from a U.S. perspective General reference sources, U.S., foreign, IGO and NGO web sites One of the best lists of UN related organizations History and focus of international relations think tanks o International and Area Studies (Larry Schankman) Lists and annotates top regional studies web sites International news sources o International Relations (U.Brit.Colum.) Unique links from a Canadian perspective Major subjects include peace/security/defense, national,ethnic or religious conflicts, and international economic development o International Relations Links Links to discussion groups, journals, newspapers, and international law sites with a Canadian/U.S. focus Maintained by the Canadian Institute of International Affairs o PRAXIS (UPenn) Links to international governmental and non-governmental, regional, and social work organizations Links to social and economic development web sites arranged by subject (e.g. population, housing, culture, employment) as well as social services available Reference tools for social workers in the field of international development, including maps, flags, contacts, and travel information
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it