MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7098937011

Extracting Growth from Mining

2005· article· en· W7098937011 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicNatural Resources and Economic Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Mining industryInvestment (military)PluckingGovernment (linguistics)Foreign direct investmentNet present value
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mining industry is one of the sectors identified by government to spur growth in the economy. It is projected that over the next five years, mining would grow by an average of 13 percent 1 following the Mineral Action Plan, which provides the framework for the development of the country’s vast mineral resources. Of the country’s total land area of 30 million hectares, about 30 percent is geologically prospective for metallic minerals. The industry received a big boost last December 2004 when the Supreme Court (SC) ruled the Mining Act of 1995 as constitutional. Large investments are expected to pour in because of the SC decision. Foreign firms are now allowed to own 100 percent of mining operations where the operations are under a financial or technical assistance agreement (FTAA) and the project investment is greater than US$50 million. The impact of the SC decision appears to have already borne fruit. The gross value added from mining and quarrying has gone up by 14 percent in the second quarter of 2005 from its level in the same period in 2004. The growth of the sector was primarily induced by the infusion of investments in the Palawan Nickel Project of Coral

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.877
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNatural Resources and Economic DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207