MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7098979678

UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL BENEFITS OF THE APPLICATION OF WEB-MINING METHODS AND TECHNIQUES FOR THE FIELD OF ANALYTICAL CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT OF THE MARKETING FONCTION IN A KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVE THE SIS PRESENTED AS PARTIAL REQU

2014· article· en· W7098979678 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLibraries and Information Services
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField (mathematics)Perspective (graphical)Service (business)Customer service
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Service des bibliothèques · A vertfssecrient La diffusion de ce mémoire se fait dans le ~ respect des droits de son auteur, qui a signé le formulaire Autorisation de repfOduire. et de diffuser un travail de recherche de cycles supérieurs (SDU-522- Rév.01-2006). Cette autorlsatlon.stlpule que <<conformément · à l'article 11 du Règlement no 8 des études de cycles supérieurs, [l'auteur] concède à l'Université du Québec à Montréal une llc~nce non exclusive d'utilisation et de. publication de la totalité ou d'une partie importante de [son] travail de recherche pour des fins pédagogiques et non commerciales. Plus précisément, [l'auteur) autorise l'Université du Québec à Montréal à reproduire, diffuser, prêter, distribuer ou vendre des.· copies de. [son] travail da recherche à des fins non commerciales sur quelque support que ce soit, y comprlsl'lntemet. Cette licence et cette autorisation n'entrainent pas une renonciation de [la} part [de l'auteur] à [ses} droits moraux ni à [ses] droits da propriété intellectuelle. Sauf ententè contraire, [l'auteur] conserve la liberté de diffuser et de commercialiser ou non ce travail dont [ill possède un exemplaire.. » UNNERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score0.642

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLibraries and Information ServicesFrench-language works237,207