MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7098996460

1 Hydrologic Models for Inverse Climate Change Impact Modeling

2014· article· en· W7098996460 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant and Fungal Species Descriptions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimate changeHydrological modellingClimate modelVulnerability (computing)Water resourcesDownscalingDrainage basinEffects of global warming
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: It is expected that the global climate change will have significant impacts on the regime of hydrologic extremes. As a consequence, the design and management of water resource systems will have to adapt to the changing hydrologic extremes. An inverse approach to the modeling of hydrologic risk and vulnerability to changing climatic conditions was developed in this project to improve our understanding of hydro-climatic interactions. The approach identifies critical hydrologic exposures that may lead to local failures of existing water resource systems. The critical exposures, such as floods and droughts, are then inversely transformed into corresponding meteorological conditions by means of hydrologic models. The hydrologic models are linked with future climate scenarios generated by a weather generating algorithm coupled with outputs from global circulation models. This paper summarizes the development and application of hydrologic models to the inverse climate change impact modeling. Both event-based and continuous models were used to assess the potential impact of a changed climate on the timing and magnitude of hydrologic extremes in a densely populated and urbanized river basin in south-western Ontario, Canada. The results show significant changes in the frequency of hydro-climatic extremes under future climate scenarios in the study area. 1. Inverse Climate Change Impact Modeling

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.871
Threshold uncertainty score0.321

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlant and Fungal Species DescriptionsFrench-language works237,207