Approving Body: Board of Governors Authority:
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reason for Policy 1.1 To establish an award that celebrates and recognizes public service and community building activities by individuals, groups, and organizations in the Province of Manitoba. Part II Policy Content 2.1 The Distinguished Service Award is the highest honour bestowed by the Board of Governors. Distinguished Service Awards are awarded to individuals, groups, and organizations whose contributions improve the social or cultural well-being of the people of Manitoba. It is intended to recognize those whose service efforts build a better province for us all. The focus of the award is the recognition of distinguished community service to the University, the City of Winnipeg, and the Province of Manitoba, as opposed to individual achievements. 2.2 The Board of Governors shall decide the recipients of Distinguished Service Awards after considering the recommendations of the Distinguished Service Awards Selection Committee. 2.3 Normally, no more than two (2) Distinguished Service Awards shall be awarded in one academic year. 2.4 All residents of Manitoba who are not current employees of the University of Manitoba are eligible for nomination for the Distinguished Service Award. 2.5 Normally Distinguished Service Awards shall be presented at Convocation, but the Chair of the Board of Governors may authorize presentation at another suitable occasion. 2.6 Recipients of the Distinguished Service Award shall receive a University of Manitoba Distinguished Service Medal. A citation shall be read at the presentation ceremony. 2.7 The University will not normally offer a Distinguished Service Award to anyone who is not in a position to accept it in person.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.023 | 0.099 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.030 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.084 | 0.027 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.233 | 0.398 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".