MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7099042299

Background

2015· article· en· W7099042299 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConidiumAspergillus fumigatusAspergillosisHyphaConidiationOrganismLeukemiaPathogen
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mold Aspergillus fumigatus spreads through dispersion of its asexual spores, called conidia. When inhaled, these conidia are efficiently eliminated by innate immune defenses. But, in immunocompromised patients, conidia escape killing to germinate into hyphae which invade host cells and proliferate in blood vessels, often disseminating to other organs. lnvasive aspergillosis (lA) occurs in up to 15 % of Canadian patients with acute leukemia or undergoing allogenic stem cell transplantation, and the mortality rate of IA remains greater than 50%, despite the use of new antifungal agents. Novel approaches to modify the natural history of this illness are urgently needed. A fumigatus is an opportunistic pathogen with relatively low intrinsic virulence. As a result the growth rate of the organism plays a crucial role in its ability to cause disease, and strains with reductions in hyphal growth rate exhibit reduced or no virulence. Efficient hyphal growth is favored by the fact that during invasive aspergillosis there is no conidiation allowing the organism to direct its energy towards vegetative growth. Conversely, work from our group and others has demonstrated

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.698
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3020.153

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→