STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL BILL OF RIGHTS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
I am pleased to approve the Black Sturgeon River Provincial Park Management Plan as the official policy for the protection and management of Black Sturgeon River Provincial Park. The plan reflects the Ministry of Natural Resources ’ and Ontario Parks ’ intent to protect the natural and cultural features of Black Sturgeon River Provincial Park, while maintaining and developing high quality opportunities for outdoor recreation and heritage appreciation for the residents of Ontario and visitors to the province. The Black Sturgeon River Provincial Park is located within the Lake Nipigon Basin Signature site, one of 9 such areas featured in the Ontario’s Living Legacy Land Use Strategy (1999). Signature Sites are identified for their range of natural and recreational values and their potential to contribute to future recration and tourism. This management plan has been developed under the general direction of the Lake Nipigon Basin Signature Site Ecological Land Use and Resource Management Strategy, which provides the overall context for land use and resource management activities in the Basin. The plan includes a prioritized implementation strategy and summarizes the public consultation that occurred as part of the planning process. The park management plan will be used to guide the management of this park. It may be reviewed to address changing issues or conditions. A review will be held as required. I wish to extend my sincere thanks to all those who participated in the public consultation process. Yours truly,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.024 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.012 | 0.013 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.082 | 0.054 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".