MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7099075778

Faculty of Graduate Studies APPLICATION FOR GRADUATE ADMISSION Instructions to Applicants

2011· article· en· W7099075778 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHumor Studies and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChequeAccounts payableAcademic institutionCashInstitutionWork (physics)Graduate students
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Send a signed, complete application form to each graduate program to which you are applying. Do NOT send your documents to the Faculty of Graduate Studies. APPLICATION FEE Put the application fee into a separate envelope clearly marked with “Graduate Application Fee ” and your name and include the envelope with your application. Applicants are required to submit a nonrefundable CDN $60.00 application fee with each application. Applications received will not be processed if the application fee has not been paid. The application fee may be in the form of cash, a money order, or a micro-encoded cheque in Canadian or the equivalent amount in US currency, made payable to the University of Calgary. Do not send cash through the mail. This non-refundable application fee covers the processing of the application file, whether or not the applicant is admitted to the University of Calgary. ACADEMIC HISTORY Complete one line for each academic institution attended or degree awarded since post-secondary studies began. Applicants must arrange to have two sets of official transcripts from all post-secondary institutions attended (regardless of the number of courses taken and the amount of time spent there) sent directly to the department(s) to which the applicant is applying. Official transcripts are transcripts sent directly from the issuing institution to the receiving institution. Transcripts received from the student or any other third party will be considered unofficial. (For work done at the University of Calgary, many departments will print and certify an Infonet transcript for an applicant. This will be accepted in place of an official University of Calgary transcript. Infonet transcripts printed by the applicant will not be accepted.) If the original transcripts (and the degree certificates from those institutions that do not indicate the awarding of degrees on the transcripts) are in a language other than English, the applicant must also send the department an additional copy of each transcript (and degree certificate) with a notarized word-forword English translation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.503
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.419
GPT teacher head0.468
Teacher spread0.049 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHumor Studies and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207