Orthocarpus bracteosus Benth. rosy owl-clover Scrophulariaceae (Figwort Family) Orthocarpus bracteosus rosy owl-clover Status: State Endangered
Bibliographic record
Abstract
General Description: An erect annual with limited branching, 4-16 inches tall, minutely hairy with the upper part of plant somewhat sticky-glandular; lower leaves are long-lanceolate, the upper leaves are 3 to 5 lobed, with the lobes spreading; bracts are purplish, broad, with 3 to 5 narrow spreading lobes; spike is compact; flowers are showy, rose-pink and exceed the bracts; upper lip of corolla is slender and slightly hooked at the apex; lower lip is sac-shaped; anthers are hairy. Identification Tips: The rose-pink color of the flowers is unique among Pacific Northwest species of Orthocarpus. Phenology: Flowers from June through August. Range: Vancouver Island, B.C. to Oregon, mostly west of the Cascades, southward to east of the Cascades to Plumas County, CA. In WA, it is currently known from one meadow complex in Klickitat County (Eastern Cascades physiographic province). There are also historical records from San Juan and Whatcom counties, WA (Puget Trough physiographic province). Habitat: The extant sites in WA are all associated with moist meadow conditions in the transition zone between wetland and upland. These sites are graminoid and forb dominated with little to no shrub or tree cover. Adjacent forested areas are dominated by a mixture of ponderosa pine and Douglas fir. Two other rare plant species occur in the immediate vicinity: long-bearded sego lily (Calochortus longebarbatus var. longebarbatus) and Oregon coyote-thistle (Eryngium petiolatum). Ecology: Specific factors regarding the ecology of this species are unknown. Presumably the hydrologic regime is significant, given the species ’ restriction to the transition zone around wetland perimeters. All locations also receive full sunlight. Fire may have played a limited role historically in the maintenance of suitable habitat. The species can also tolerate some grazing pressure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".