MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7099116159

CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM DECAY OF OSCILLATONS: OSCILLATING SELF-GRAVITATING REAL SCALAR FIELD SOLITONS ∗

2003· article· en· W7099116159 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScalar fieldQuantum field theoryScalar (mathematics)GravitonAnnihilationQuantumField (mathematics)Boson
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The oscillating gravitational field of an oscillaton of finite mass M causes it to lose energy by emitting classical scalar field waves, but at a rate that is non-perturbatively tiny for small µ ≡ GMm/¯hc, where m is the scalar field mass: dM/dt ≈ −3797437.776333 015(c 3 /G)µ −2 e −39.433 795197 160163/µ [1 + O(µ)]. Oscillatons also decay by the quantum process of the annihilation of scalarons into gravitons, which is only perturbatively small in µ, giving by itself dM/dt ≈ −0.008513223934732 692(m 2 c 2 /¯h)µ 5 [1 + O(µ 2)]. Thus the quantum decay is faster than the classical one for µ < ∼ 39.4338/[ln (¯hc/Gm 2)+ 7ln (1/µ)+19.9160]. The time for an oscillaton to decay away completely into free scalarons and gravitons is tdecay ∼ 2¯h 6 c 3 /G 5 m 11 ∼ 10 324 yr(1meV/mc 2) 11. Oscillatons of more than one real scalar field of the same mass generically asymptotically approach a static-geometry U(1) boson star configuration with µ = µ0, at the rate d(GM/c 3)/dt ≈ [(C/µ 4)e −α/µ + Q(m/mPl) 2 µ 3](µ 2 − µ 2 0), with µ0 depending on the magnitudes and relative phases of the oscillating fields, and with the same constants C, α, and Q given numerically above for the single-field case that is equivalent to µ0 = 0. Alberta-Thy-10-03, gr-qc/0310006

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research→French-language works237,207→