Monitoring and Data Collection Along the Peace River during the 2004-2005
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
covered during the winter months. The presence of an ice cover on the Peace River, depending on the time period during the ice season, can lead to flooding or other ice related issues that pose a risk to property as well as human health and safety. In order to manage this risk it is necessary to continually monitor the Peace River throughout the ice season to provide near real-time data collection and information to those affected by the Peace River ice. The collection of data for numerous types of river ice process for operational purposes provides the River Engineering Team of Alberta Environment with the ability to respond to developing river ice related issues in an effective and efficient manner. Data related to the meteorological, hydrologic, and hydraulic characteristics of the Peace River has been collected for a number of ice seasons. The 2004-2005 ice season on the Peace River was no exception. The data collected along the Peace River during freezeup through breakup allowed the River Engineering Team to operate effectively as well as document, in co-operation with partners, the ice season including a secondary consolidation at the Town of Peace River and an instance of low dissolved oxygen in the Peace River during breakup. The purpose of this paper is to report on provincial and federal sources of data that are available as well as to highlight some of the observations that may warrant further study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it