DAVID F. MATTHEWS ENVIRONMENTALLY RESPONSIBLE BUILDING-BLT 140 COHOUSING AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The typical American approach to buying, or (for the fortunate ones) building a house is to choose from the existing market or available land. The purchase is made and one moves into the location and tries to fit into the existing community and environment. The majority of new communities are established by developers and engineers, usually only interested in making the most money, and how to move the vehicles around, respectively. Little consideration is given to the environment (through haphazard building and street orientation), the pedestrian (forced to use the automobile) or community (usually consisting of strip malls and segregated zoning). This is the unfortunate picture across America, except for pre-automotive traditional towns and a growing movement of intentional communities called Cohousing. Cohousing started in Denmark in the early 1970’s and has spread to northern Europe, Canada and the United States. It came about in response to housing options that no longer addressed people’s needs. Cohousing is a mix of traditional village concepts adapted to the contemporary lifestyle. Each individual or family has a self-sufficient residence, but also shares common facilities
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.065 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".