APPLICATION FOR MARKET RENT ACCOMMODATION: Instructions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Please read these instructions carefully. Before submitting your application, please make sure that you have included the following information. APPLICATION FORM: Your application form must be completely filled out and signed by every member of your household who is 16 years of age and older. Use the back of the form if you need more space. ASSESSMENT OF ABILITY TO PAY RENT: INCOME VERIFICATION: You must include proof of your current income and 3-5 year income history for each household member listed on the application form. Current income documentation must include: a) A recent pay stub showing your gross income and A letter of employment for each employed member of your household, stating: i) the name, address, and phone number of the employer ii) gross annual salary iii) length of employment and/or b) A recent cheque stub from social assistance with a copy of your Drug Card, pensions or other sources of income and/or c) Income verification from a certified accountant or a certified copy of your most recent tax return if you are self-employed RENTAL HISTORY: You must provide a detailed rental history for a minimum of 3-5 years. You must provide enough information so that Toronto Community Housing can contact the landlords you have listed on your application form for more information about your rental history. CREDIT REFERENCES: Toronto Community Housing may obtain a rental report from Rent Check and a credit check from Equifax. If we cannot get any information, we may request more information from you. PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION: You must provide copies of 2 pieces of identification for each household member 16 years of age and older:
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.912 | 0.838 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".