THE DAMPIER ARCHIPELAGO AND THE BURRUP PENINSULA The Heritage values of the Dampier Archipelago
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is little evidence of early understanding of the heritage values of the Dampier Archipelago, though in 1964 the West Australian Sub-Committee of the Australian Academy of Science National Parks Committee requested that the Dampier Archipelago become a either a Reserve or a National Park. They wished to see the area vested in the National Parks Board of W.A., and had applied to the Under Secretary of Lands for such a decision. In January 1967 the matter was shelved at the request of Mines Department (Under Secretary for Lands, 1967). In 1964, the first contracts for export of iron ore from the Pilbara region of W.A. were signed, thus starting an intense period of industrial development in that region. Before this time, very few white people had ever set foot on the islands of the Dampier Archipelago. As time has gone on, the vastness and complexity of the petroglyph2-strewn landscape has become more readily apparent. By 1973, Enzo Virili had recorded 6,000 carvings in a five square mile area, and 4,000 of these were in Gum Tree Valley alone (F L Virili, 1973). As industry has moved into the area, heritage reports continue to confirm the world significance of the area’s heritage values.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".