MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7099233062

i DOWNSCALING SATELLITE MICROWAVE OBSERVATIONS TO FACILITATE HIGH RESOLUTION HYDROLOGICAL MODELLING

2015· article· en· W7099233062 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDownscalingWater contentWater cycleWatershedHydrological modellingData assimilationSatelliteEarth observationHigh resolution
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soil moisture is an essential climate variable and provides critical state information for hydrological applications. The state of soil moisture influences the exchange of water and energy between the earth surface and the atmosphere, partitions infiltration and runoff, can limit the net primary productivity of a region and govern the dynamics of geochemical processes. Satellite observations can be used to provide information about this important variable but are often available at a scale that is far greater than most hydrological processes. The scope of the research presented in this dissertation was to identify practical methods to facilitate the use of coarse scale satellite soil moisture information in higher resolution hydrological and land-surface modelling applications. Research was primarily conducted in the Hamilton-Halton watershed of Southern Ontario, Canada, although other watersheds and datasets were periodically used in some chapters. A comprehensive review was conducted on the use of high resolution soil moisture information for hydrological applications, and data assimilation was identified

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.164
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.106 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoil Moisture and Remote SensingFrench-language works237,207