Management of the Intertidal Clam Resource 45Western Ge graphy, 5/6(1995/6), pp. 45–73 © Western Division, Canadian Association of Geographers Management of the Intertidal Clam Resource: A British Columbia Experiment in Limited Entry and Local Participati
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the mid 1980s, the intertidal clam fishery in British Columbia experienced a short lived bonanza, based pri-marily on an introduced species—the manila clam. In 1989, as a result of overharvesting and other factors, one of the most productive manila clam fisheries on the B.C. Coast—Savary Island—was closed. The Federal Depart-ment of Fisheries and Oceans re-opened the Savary Is-land fishery in 1994 under a pilot management project that involved both license limitation and the establish-ment of a Community Management Board. This paper presents the results of a review of this pilot project and suggests a number of steps that, if taken, could enhance the prospects for greater community control of the com-mercial clam fishery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".