Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract-PAN concentrations were determined during the summer of 1989 and the winter of 1990 at three sites in Ontario representing urban (Toronto), suburban downwind (Stouffville) and rural (Dorset) locations. PAN concentrations were found to reach levels of ~4 ppb in Toronto under conditions ofstagnant southerly air flow. Observed PAN concentrations were compared with concurrent measurements of PPN and 03' PPN concentrations were found to be, on average, between 8 and 11 % of those ofPAN, with slightly higher PPN/PAN ratios found for air masses that were relatively anthropogenic-pollution impacted. For the Dorset site, however, the dependence on air-mass origin was small. The slopes of regressions of ozone vs PAN were found to increase substantially from urban to rural air masses, with typical 03/PAN ratios for a mid-range ozone concentration of 50 ppb being SO, 110 and 330, for Toronto, Stouft'viIle and Dorset, respectively. Analysis of the data for Toronto and Stouffville under varying meteorological conditions indicates significant potential for oxidant production in the absence of transport of pollutants from other sources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it