POLISH AIR TRANSPORT AMONG STRUCTURAL CHANGES IN THE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary. The predicted tripling of regional air carriage before the year 2027 sets extremely high requirements on future aircraft choice. The main competitors for a share of this market are Bombardier from Canada and Embraer from Brazil, followed by the French-Italian combination ATR. Having gone through a series of important changes since 1989, PLL LOT S.A. must also compete in this highly dynamic market. Its choices in equipment will have an important effect on its future market position. POLSKI TRANSPORT LOTNICZY W WARUNKACH ZMIAN STRUKTURALNYCH ŚWIATOWEJ FLOTY LOTNICTWA CYWILNEGO Streszczenie. Przewidywany, trzykrotny wzrost przewozów regionalnych do roku 2027, stawia wyjątkowo wysokie wymagania dotyczące wyboru floty. W tym segmencie przedsiębiorstwami konkurującymi o zdobycie udziałów w rynku są: kanadyjski Bombardier, brazylijski Embraer, a przede wszystkim francusko – włoskie konsorcjum ATR. Podążając za serią istotnych zmian, zapoczątkowanych w 1989 roku, PLL LOT S.A. również musi konkurować na bardzo dynamicznie zmieniającym się rynku. Jego
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.043 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".