Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quaternary mapping has progressed on two fronts. Firstly, progress was made on a digital seamless compilation of 1:250 000-scale surficial geology for all of Manitoba from published paper and digital maps, and secondly, three-dimensional mapping of the southern Phanerozoic terrane of Manitoba, which uses the surficial geology as a key input. The digital seamless surficial geology compilation is set to be the long overdue replacement for the original Surficial Geological Map of Manitoba (Nielsen et al., 1981). To achieve this goal all the most current and most detailed paper maps required for the 1:250 000-scale compilation have been digitized. Edge matching and polygon conflicts are being resolved with the aid of a digital elevation model (DEM) derived from the recently released shuttle radar topography mission (SRTM) data (United States Geological Survey, 2002). Original mapping of several previously unmapped areas was also carried out with the aid of the SRTM DEM and limited ground truthing. Progress has also been made in 3-D mapping. Three-dimensional geological mapping of the Phanerozoic succession in southern Manitoba, south of 55°N and west of 95°W, is being completed as a successor activity to the Prairie compo-nent of the National Geoscience Mapping Program (NATMAP). Modelling is being done in manageably sized tiles; the Lake Winnipeg basin has been completed, and in combination with the already completed southern Prairie NATMAP area of southeastern Manitoba, has enhanced our understanding of the eastern edge of Phanerozoic rocks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.580 | 0.419 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".