Bibliographic record
Abstract
type b conjugate vaccine (DTwP–IPV–Hib) to a combination vaccine containing acellular pertussis (DTaP–IPV–Hib). In this issue, Vickers and colleagues,1 using passive surveillance data from the Saskatoon Regional Health Authority in Saskatchewan for the period 1995–2005, report on their analy-sis of the effect of the change to the new vaccine on the inci-dence of pertussis among children less than 10 years of age. They found that, among infants (< 1 year old) and preschool children (aged 1–4 years), those who had received either the whole-cell pertussis vaccine or a combination of the whole-cell and acellular pertussis vaccines had a lower incidence of pertussis than those who had received only the acellular vac-cine; they found a reverse trend among children 5–9 years of age. Vickers and colleagues concluded that consideration be given to either modifying the current acellular pertussis vac-
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.037 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.027 | 0.013 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.130 | 0.047 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".