MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7099334124

UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO

2002· article· en· W7099334124 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCladding (metalworking)Photonic crystalEnvelope (radar)SlabDielectricWaveguideDispersion relation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inspired by the envelope approximation commonly applied to semiconductor heterostruc-tures, an analytical approach to study photonic crystal waveguides is presented. By treating the waveguide core as a slowly-varying perturbation in the cladding photonic crystal, mul-tiple scales analysis is used to derive an envelope equation which solves for the propagation constants and frequencies of the guided modes. The envelope approximation is completely general for sufficiently weak perturbations and applies to photonic crystal waveguides of any dimensionality. The multiple scales approach is verified through comparisons between the envelope ap-proximation and results from full numerical simulations. Heterostructure slab waveguides in three dimensional photonic crystal and a slab waveguide with a homogeneous dielectric core surrounded by photonic crystal cladding are studied. The mode shapes are in excel-lent agreement with simulations. The computed waveguide dispersion relations agree with simulated results to 1%. The implications and limitations of the envelope approximation are discussed and quan-

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.506
Threshold uncertainty score0.721

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4940.155

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSperm and Testicular FunctionFrench-language works237,207