Vol. 23, No. 1 ALcoHoussa: C AD EXmmAL R.SrtC'H January 1999
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BZDs a controversial treatment for anxiety in problem drinkers. ? Anxious problem drinkers are most likely to drink when their anxiety symptoms are pronounced. s Therefore, one way BZDs may improve treatment outcome in this population is by reducing the need to "self-medicate" anxiety symptoms with alcohol. However, BZDs also have a range of effects in addition to anxiolysis that may contribute to their clinical utility. One such effect is impairment of mem- ory. Specifically, BZDs impair encoding of information into From the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (M.Z.. T.T.), Toronto, Omario. Canada: and the University of Toronto at Scarborough (C.M.M), Scarborough' Ontario, Canada. Received for publication April 6 199& accepted October 30. 1998 Requests for reprints: Martin Zack; Ph.D.. Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 33 Russell Street, Toronto. Ontario. Canada M55 251. FAX: (416) 595-6618 E-mad: nuack@aoeg Col.'right 1999 by The Research Society on Alcoholism. 174 memory
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.709 | 0.563 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".